[1]易文彬,王永生,杨琼方,等.实船阻力及流场数值预报方法[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2014,(05):532-536.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.10067043.201301004]
 YI Wenbin,WANG Yongsheng,YANG Qiongfang,et al.Numerical methods for predicting ship resistance and flow field[J].hebgcdxxb,2014,(05):532-536.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.10067043.201301004]
点击复制

实船阻力及流场数值预报方法(/HTML)
分享到:

《哈尔滨工程大学学报》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2014年05期
页码:
532-536
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Numerical methods for predicting ship resistance and flow field
文章编号:
10067043(2014)05053205
作者:
易文彬王永生杨琼方李剑
海军工程大学 动力工程学院, 湖北 武汉 430033
Author(s):
YI Wenbin WANG Yongsheng YANG Qiongfang LI Jian
College of Marine Power Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China
关键词:
阻力预报实尺度粗糙度虚拟流体粘度实船阻力流场数值预报
分类号:
U661.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.10067043.201301004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为快速准确预报实船阻力及流场信息,对基于模型尺度数值计算外推方法、虚拟流体粘度方法、实尺度计算方法的阻力及流场计算结果进行了比较和分析。在傅汝德数0.15~0.41内,3种方法与船模试验值外推预报的实船阻力差分别在7%、4.5%、3.5%以内,其中虚拟流体粘度方法和实尺度计算方法均考虑了粗糙度的影响。在波形与伴流场的比较中,虚拟流体粘度方法与实尺度计算方法预报结果基本一致。虚拟流体粘度的方法能够较好预报实船的阻力和流场,且计算量最小,具有较强的工程应用价值。

参考文献/References:

[1]STERN F, YANG Jianming, WANG Zhaoyuan, et al. Com putational ship hydrodynamics: nowadays and way forward[C]//29th Symposium on Nnaval Hhydrodynamics. Gothenburg,Sweden, 2012:2631. [2]RAVEN H C, VAN D, STARKE A R, et al. Towards a CFDbased prediction of ship performance—Progress in predicting full scale resistance and scale effects[J]. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 2009,150(5):1418. [3]BHUSHAN S, XING T, CARRICA P, et al. Model and fullscale URANS simulation of Athena resistance, powering, seakeeping, and 5415 maneuvering[J]. Journal of Ship Research,2009,53(4): 179198. [4]刘志华, 熊鹰, 韩宝玉. 雷诺相似船模预报实船推进因子的数值方法[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报,2008, 29(7):658662. LIU Zhihua, XIONG Ying, HAN Baoyu. Accurately predicting the propulsion factors of a ship using a Reynoldssimilarity ship model[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2008,29(7):658662. [5]倪崇本, 朱仁传, 繆国平, 等.一种基于CFD的船舶总阻力预报方法[J].水动力学研究与进展,A辑, 2010, 25(5):579586. NI Chongben, ZHU Renchuan, MIAO Guoping, et al. A method for ship resistance prediction based on CFD computation[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010,25(5):579586. [6]盛振邦, 刘应中. 船舶原理[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社,2003:154 157. [7]OLIVIERI A, PISTANI F, AVANZINI A, et al. Towing tank experiments of resistance, sinkage and trim, boundary layer, wake, and free surface flow around a naval combatant INSEAN 2340 modelR].Iowa:The University of Iowa,2005. [8]STERN F, LONGO J, PENNA R, et al. International collaboration on benchmark CFD validation data for surface combatant DTMB model 5415[C]//Proceedings of 23rd ONR symposium on naval hydrodynamics. Iowa,2000:1722. [9]ANSYS Inc. ANSYS CFXsolver theory guide[M]. (s.l.):ANSYS Inc, 2007. [10]HE Chengbin, HUANG Jianguo, HAN Jin, et al. Cyclic shift keying spread spectrum underwater acoustic communication[J]. Acta Phys Sin, 2009, 58(12): 83798385. [11]SCHULTZ M P. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering[J]. Biofouling, 2007,23(13):331341. [12]〖JP3〗ECA L, HOEKSTRA M, RAVEN H C. Quantifying roughness effects by ship viscous flow calculations[C]// 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. California, 2010:1217.

相似文献/References:

[1]何广华,张子豪,武雨嫣,等.S-175船关键剖面的入水砰击模拟[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2019,40(06):1058.[doi:10.11990/jheu.201804011]
 HE Guanghua,ZHANG Zihao,WU Yuyan,et al.Simulation of the water-entry slamming of an S-175 containership at critical sections[J].hebgcdxxb,2019,40(05):1058.[doi:10.11990/jheu.201804011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2013-01-05. 网络出版时间:2013-11-12. 基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51009144). 作者简介:易文彬(1990-),男,硕士研究生; 王永生(1955-),男,教授,博士生导师. 通信作者:易文彬,E-mail:yiwenbinhjgc@ 163.com.
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-07-10